Hate Mail
I suggest you do some research. Perhaps this will open your eyes to the manipulaion and lies being told in order to fool the public. Yes there are people playing games in the world.Reading a book written by Chomsky is not "research." That is called "reading some one else's research." Further, what Chomsky does is not "research". What Chomsky does is a sophisticated version of the polemic. Just because he uses bigger words than Fox News, doesn't make it any less of a polemic. By the way, this blog is a polemic, since you obviously can't distinguish between my rants, Chomsky's rants, and "research."
read page 127-128 of Understanding Power. I will summarize: One of the false premises is the one you hold about "Israel being the only one that wants peace". This is the false doctrine of "arab rejectionism". That doctrine is as Chomsky explains in "Necessary Illusions" "... to present the United States and Israel as "yearning for peace" and pursuing a "peace process," while in reality they have led the rejectionist camp and have been blocking peace initiatives that have broad international and regional support."You ever seen that movie with Ben Damon and Matt Affleck...I think it was called Good Will Hunting Two: Hunting Season? Anyhow, remember that scene where the Harvard kid is trying to make himself seem smart by quoting books and stuff? And how in reality it just made him look like a prig? Yeah, how do you like dem apples Kirk? Look, there is nothing really more to say. You read Chomsky. Big whoop. I've read Chomsky. I teach Chomsky. I'm not going to defend the media---I think Chomsky's theory in Manufacturing Consent is basically right--but let's not mix Chomsky's own illusions of the Arab street being just like you and me with empirical reality. By the way, I replied to Kirk with a number of rhetorical questions and then asked him to not e-mail me again.
Apparently, he didn't get the whole, "please don't e-mail me again" thang. From Kirk's second hate-mail to me:
This isn't about Chomsky you fool. It is about the American people being manipulated and if you weren't such a dumb f**k that fact might sink in.Manipulated. Right. Why do I get the feeling you can't distinguish between the propoganda put out by Newsweek and the propoganda put out by the Nation and Chomsky himself? Propoganda is propoganda. Oh, and thanks for calling me a dumb...well, you know.
Here is info becasue [sic] I know you are too lazy to go tothe library [sic]....at which point Kirk, who apparently is less lazy than me, quotes Chomsky AGAIN.
I replied by asking him which point of "don't e-mail me again" does he not get and if he understands what a "rhetorical question was." From his third hate-mail:
No, can you expain it to me, what is is [sic] supposed to mean to me? You said ,"Please do not write again",what do you mean by that? Do you mean don't write anything on the Internet to anyone anymore? I guess Iam [sic] too slow to understand what you mean.Oh, I'm sorry. I thought that being an expert on Chomsky you might understand normal linguistic construction? Like, stop wasting my time with your inane quotes and religious zeal for leftist paranoia. I get enough spam as it is.
You are an ignorant shit that is afraid to think for yourself and look into the issues.Right. That's why I quote someone else's arguments ad nauseum. Because I'm the one who is afraid to think for myself.
Did I mention this prigs e-mail address is helpkirk@yahoo.com?

